Simple and a straightforward application with accurate results.A powerful application for transferring files and folders.On concluding notes, Ultracopier 2.2 is a very simple and reliable application that enhances the file copying process maintaining its integrity and ensuring lossless data transfer.
Moreover, it automatically predicts overwrite situations and make the transfers even more accurate. Error and collision management provides support for getting detailed information about the data transfer. A variety of custom settings and advanced features are there to produce speed limitations, searching through the copy list, and provides resume capability. You can also download TeraCopy 2.3Ī variety of powerful features are there to improve productivity. This powerful application provides complete support for working with usb keys, hard drives, CDs, and a variety of other formats. It provides a complete solution for processing the files and folders and flawless conversion of the data. It provides a simple and reliable solution that allows the users to perform all the operations accurately and ensures the integrity of the files after transferring so there is almost no chances of data loss. Unlike Windows default file copying features, Ultracopier 2.2 comes with a very reliable solution that delivers much more than the built-in file copier. Ultracopier 2.2 is a very powerful application for transferring and copying files from one location to another without any harm to the files. And there are more unmentioned and even unknown to me, as I claim to be no expert in the field yet know that the above conditions and content are very important to an evaluation.Ĭould I recommend that some additional research on your part into such testing is worth your while? I would really enjoy seeing a more comprehensive follow-on to what you started here.Download Ultracopier 2.2 free latest full version direct download link one-click standalone offline installer for Windows 32-bit and 64-bit. So while your test is one point on the map of efficiency or effectiveness, it just doesn’t seem to paint much of a picture of the efficiency of the programs under a variety of conditions and with pre-run context held constant.Īll these factors above are quite important to perform a real-world comprehensive test of the programs. copying MULTIPLE LARGE files, or MULTIPLE SMALL files, or a MIX OF LARGE AND SMALLl?Īnd I don’t see where you have RUN TESTS MULTIPLE TIMES to see if there is an average speed for each program for each scenario? So …that’s it? You tested ONE file? ONE time for each program? Did you clear Windows cache before each run? Apparently you DIDN’T test various scenario, i.e. Please excuse me, as I have some criticisms of the testing.
0 kommentar(er)
